It’s Time to Radically Reevaluate “Reared-Apart” (Separated) Twin Studies

-

  

Summary and Link to the Main Article


It’s Time to Radically Reevaluate “Reared-Apart” (Separated) Twin Studies

 

By Jay Joseph, Psy.D.

August 9th, 2020


(Link to the full-article pdf HERE)

The “validity of twin studies” question is very important because these studies supply the main “scientific” evidence in support of the “nature” (genetic) side of the long-running “nature-nurture” debate. The question of whether genes or environments are the main cause of human behavioral differences has profound implications for social relations and political policy decisions. 

In a previous article I summarized the critique of “twin method” studies, which use reared-together twins. I argued that the main assumption these studies are based on is false, and I concluded that the twin method should be abandoned as a tool for the detection of genetic influences on behavior. In the present article I summarize and add to the main arguments that I and other critics have made against genetic interpretations of the results of “twins reared apart” (TRA) studies (also known as “separated twin studies”), with a special emphasis on the famous “Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.” Contrary to typical media and textbook descriptions, most twin pairs found in TRA studies were only partially reared apart. In the Minnesota study, I show that the researchers’ strong genetic biases led them to suppress their own control group results in the area of IQ, and that they based their study on numerous questionable or false assumptions. In addition, independent researchers have been prohibited from inspecting the raw data, which includes test scores and information on the degree of separation experienced by twin pairs.

I have developed my analysis of twins reared apart studies in books, peer-reviewed articles, and online articles since 2001. After reviewing the numerous problem areas and biases found in these studies, in this most recent review I conclude that no TRA study published to date has provided scientifically acceptable evidence that genetic factors influence human behavioral differences, and that a radical reassessment of behavioral twin research should soon begin.

Length: About 8,000 words, plus notes


Please follow this link to the full article in pdf form: It's Time to Radically Reevaluate "Reared-Apart" (Separated) Twin Studies



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

It’s Time to Abandon the “Classical Twin Method” in Behavioral Research

-
Image
Note: Many more articles on twin research and behavioral genetics can be found at https://www.madinamerica.com/author/jjoseph/ .  My 2020 analysis of reared-apart twin studies can be found HERE (First revision 8/17/2020. Second revision 12/23/2020, based on small stylistic changes, and adding a new introductory paragraph and a paragraph about a 2018 study by Segal and colleagues) By Jay Joseph, Psy.D. In this article I will argue that studies using the "classical twin method" should be abandoned in the social and behavioral sciences. I will attempt to show that the main assumption these studies are based on is false — an argument I have developed in books, peer-reviewed articles , and online articles since 1998 .  Twin studies supply the "scientific evidence" most often cited in support of the claim that human behavioral differences are strongly influenced by heredity. Yet genetic interpretations of twin studies of behavior, including areas such as I...
Read more

Levels of Identity Confusion and Attachment among Reared-Together MZ and DZ Twin Pairs

-
By Jay Joseph, Psy.D. When twin researchers attempt to assess twins’ environmental similarity, they usually ask questions such as whether, as children, twins shared the same bedroom, attended school together, dressed alike, played together, and so on. Answers to these questions reveal that reared-together MZ twin pairs (monozygotic, identical) grow up experiencing much more similar environments than experienced by same-sex DZ twin pairs (dizygotic, fraternal). Although these questions address some aspects of twins’ environmental similarity, they fail to adequately assess the nature of the attachment, conscious attempts to be alike, and the identity confusion experienced by MZ twin pairs to a far greater degree than DZ pairs. In 1960 , family therapy pioneer and twin study critic Don Jackson described “the intertwining of [MZ] twin identities, in the ego fusion that in one sense doubles the ego (because the other is felt as part of the self) and...
Read more